What is that “cooking” the mother of the Serbian maidan?

Do you recognize in the new type of protests and blockades of faculties a fusion of Croatian anarchist actions, the Albanian Mjaft movement, and CANVAS? No? Read it twice.

Unlike in previous years, when great powers were the main organizers of special operations, the fall of Assad’s regime has shown that political changes can be encouraged and directed by regional players. When it comes to Serbia, along with the noticeable activity of foreign intelligence services and various funds and foundations of the “deep state,” one should not forget the influences from the region. In addition to the Mjaft organization, whose influence on events we can trace through street protests, various performances such as spilling red paint in the squares, leaving prints of “bloody hands” and slogans like “your hands are bloody,” as well as support for Albin Kurti, the handwriting of another regional factor has been noticed.

COOKBOOK FOR SERBIAN STUDENTS

The practice of blocking faculties is not new; it has been known and applied before in Greece and Croatia by various anarchist groups. In Serbia, this model was first implemented in 2006, when representatives of the “Anarcho-syndicalist initiative” blocked the work of the Faculty of Philosophy in Belgrade. A significant factor in the further development of this practice is the anarchist manual, the so-called “Blokadna kuharica” (Blockade Cookbook), which was created in 2009 after the blockade of the Faculty of Philosophy in Zagreb. According to the “Cookbook,” one of the important methods in blocking the work of a faculty is the establishment of the so-called “plenums,” informal student bodies that function independently from legal student institutions, such as parliaments, and serve for faster and easier organization of student-blockaders. The composition of the “plenum” is determined ad hoc – it can be 5, 12, or 102 students who gather at a specific place, without the creation of candidate lists and voting, and who then declare the establishment of the “plenum.” Unlike parliaments, “plenums” are more reminiscent of Cossack assemblies.

SUPPORT FROM ZAGREB, RIJEKA, AND PULA

Aggressiveness, ideological fanaticism, primitivism, and infantilization are the main characteristics of such pseudo-organizations, which are primarily focused on freshmen, who represent the main target group. Therefore, it is unusual that this method, which was previously exclusively characteristic of the Faculty of Philosophy in Belgrade, quickly spread to other faculties in Belgrade and universities throughout Serbia. At the same time, for the first time in the history of Serbian-Croatian relations, a real “miracle” occurred: someone from Croatia supported protests in Serbia, something that has not been recorded in the 19th, 20th, or even the 21st century, until now. Support for the students came from Zagreb, Pula, and Rijeka, from their respective faculties of philosophy, with slogans and messages written in Cyrillic. The massiveness of the protests and the methods applied show that it is hard to believe that even one percent of the students at the Faculty of Philosophy in Belgrade could influence, almost overnight, the adoption of an anarchist model from Croatia, without the involvement of regional services, especially Croatian ones, which have been acting freely in Serbia since the breakup of the former state.

REVOLUTIONARY MENU

If we briefly return to Srđa Popović and his “Draft for Revolution,” we will point out a detail that went viral during the faculty blockades. Specifically, the student-blockaders protested in a relaxed atmosphere, listening to music, watching movies, and having fun with social games. They also had an abundant supply of food and drinks. The food offerings were so varied that they bordered on the bizarre; for example, they had the option to choose between gluten-free and regular bread, and they even had special meals for vegans. The amount and diversity of food and drinks not only indicate that the activities of the student-blockaders were richly sponsored but also that a model from the “Draft for Revolution” was being applied. For a color revolution to succeed, it is necessary for “revolutionaries” to form friendships through these activities (listening to music, watching movies, etc.) and to create a positive atmosphere, where food plays a central role. Srđa Popović believes that a good atmosphere fosters cohesion among demonstrators, while on the other hand, it disturbs the authorities and makes them nervous. Based on all of this, we can conclude that this year’s protests and faculty blockades represent a new development in the actions of color revolution planners. This innovation is reflected in the fusion of Croatian anarchist activities, the Albanian Mjaft movement with bloody hands, and CANVAS, leading us to conclude that Serbia, just like in 2000, has once again become an experimental area for a new type of color revolution.

MILITARY WING OF OTPOR

The planning and execution of the October 5th coup would not have been possible without the participation of foreign intelligence services. At one point, Tim Marshall, a journalist, reporter, and editor of Sky News, published the book “Shadowplay: The October 5th Regime Change in Serbia,” which is more of a collection of documents than a prose work or monograph. Following the war events and internal upheavals in the former Yugoslavia, especially the events before, during, and after the NATO aggression of 1999, Tim Marshall left us valuable testimony about the events leading up to the October 5th coup and the organizers behind it. He mentions that in the “fall of 1999, a secret meeting was arranged between a senior official from the Foreign Office and a minister from Milošević’s government.” The author also points out that Otpor had a “military wing” and that the Metal Products Factory, led by Nebojša Čović, had “thousands of pieces of weaponry and at least 2,000 trained and armed people.”

Without delving into the details and authenticity of these statements, it is important to note that Tim Marshall was a British intelligence officer who pointed out the direct involvement of the CIA and SAS in bringing down Milošević. “The events of October 5th were preceded by significant preparation. On October 4th, a meeting was held at a village tavern in Laktaši, attended by British intelligence officers, CIA agents, and representatives of the military. At that meeting, the decision was made to burn down the Parliament, and if Milošević attempted to call the military to the streets, the Supreme Command would not listen to him.” If MI6, according to Tim Marshall’s testimony, was crucial in the October 5th coup, we should not underestimate the role of British services in current processes.

THE ALCHEMISTS’ PLAN FOR SERBIA?

Documents obtained by the GrayZone portal revealed the existence of a secret operation “Alchemy” for British intelligence involvement in the Russia-Ukraine war, which, among other things, includes a plan for overthrowing the Russian government. It is not to be excluded that a similar plan exists for Serbia.

It is not an isolated thought that the move to impose sanctions on NIS (Serbia’s oil company) was coordinated with protests, which is a common method used in color revolutions when a government is subjected to simultaneous external and internal pressure. One possible reason for such behavior by the Biden administration could be that the Serbian government openly supported Donald Trump during the US elections. Current global events lead us to the conclusion that the Democrats are attempting to destabilize governments worldwide, provoke new conflicts, and cement existing ones to hinder the actions of a potential future Trump administration.

426 MILLION EUROS FOR OVERTHROWING THE GOVERNMENT

In the new circumstances, the “Red Hand” plays the same role as the old, well-known clenched fist. Uncovering the true goals and intentions of these organizations and “informal groups” would be easier if the current government accepted Aleksandar Vulin’s proposal to introduce a legal register of foreign agents, similar to the laws in the US, Russia, and Georgia. The fact that nearly 426 million euros have entered the country in the past four years to destabilize the government is concerning. At one point, Milorad Dodik also threatened with, but soon abandoned, the foreign agents law. A foreign agents law is an urgent necessity for every sovereign state. Primarily, it would positively influence the democratization of political processes and eliminate all speculations and potential “conspiracy theories” surrounding the activities of NGOs and other organizations financed from abroad.

FOLLOW THE MONEY TRAILS

The government must change only through elections, as any alternative methods only lead to the kind of disaster we see in Syria. This does not mean that young people should not react to injustices and protest, but only if they are not being paid for it. To start, it is crucial for young people to be aware enough to recognize what is being done in their name and not to allow themselves to be used as tools by various foreign agents and services. Therefore, they should heed the advice of sociologist Dr. Slobodan Antonić to follow the money trails, using it as a guide and nothing more. That something has changed in the thinking of global elites, especially those who oppose the “deep state” personified by Soros and Rockefeller, became clear when Donald Trump won the US elections. He immediately announced that part of his cabinet would include Elon Musk, who stated that through the Department of Government Efficiency, which he would lead together with Vivek Ramaswamy, they would allocate less money for funding NGO programs worldwide. Fearing the imminent disruption of donation flows, representatives of the NGO sector began to exploit the tragedy in Novi Sad, knowing that most of them would soon be deprived of regular royalties.

(The End)