The European Union has no people of its own. It has no constitution of its own. It is founded on two international treaties—the Maastricht Treaty and the Lisbon Treaty—and that does not mean it has become a state.

If the European Union, which presents itself as a guardian of democratic values, is moving toward greater control and restrictions on individual freedoms, how meaningful is Serbia's aspiration to become part of such a system?

Pakistan believes in maintaining friendly and cooperative relations with all countries on the basis of mutual respect and shared interests.

With Bulgaria and Slovenia joining the Turkish-backed military bloc, Serbia would find itself surrounded by five coordinated states. Would such a configuration create an entirely new strategic reality in the Balkans, reshaping not only the diplomatic landscape but also the very architecture of regional security?

And what should the Serbs do, given that, according to the same encyclopedia, they were subjected to "a brutal program of oppression against Orthodox Serbs and Jews"—rather than genocide?

Can the propaganda and intelligence activities of the current ambassador of the Kyiv government to Serbia, Oleksandr Lytvynenko, alter the nature of Serbian-Russian relations, primarily to the detriment of Serbia's broader national interests?