At the beginning of 2024, it seemed that the cultural and ideological matrix based on gender fluidity, LGBT activism, woke culture, and all other deviations that had taken precedence over normality would not weaken—no matter who came to lead the United States. However, with the arrival of Donald Trump, the continent entered a phase of systematic transformation.
Within just a few days of taking office, the Trump administration issued a series of key executive orders at record speed, the most significant being Executive Order No. 14168, titled “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government,” signed on January 20, 2025.
This order requires all federal institutions to recognize biological sex at birth as the only relevant criterion. In other words, the previously accepted concept of gender self-identification was abolished, along with all forms of fluid psychological deviations. “Gender-neutral” documents—such as IDs and passports that contained an “X” field for gender—ceased to be valid. A review of all federal programs, including those in education, healthcare, and employment policy, was also mandated to remove all references to and practices of “gender fluidity.”
But what did America look like just a year earlier…
UNDER THE ROOF OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH
At the end of September 2024, the American organization Do No Harm published alarming results regarding gender transition procedures among teenagers in the United States over the previous four years. According to their website, nearly 14,000 minors had undergone some form of gender transition — of those, 5,700 children underwent surgical procedures, while more than 8,500 were placed on puberty-blocking hormone therapies that halt natural physical development. What made the situation even more sensitive was the fact that Catholic hospitals — institutions under the authority of the Roman Catholic Church — were also involved in these procedures.
Although the Vatican has not yet officially legalized gay marriage, its support for the LGBT community has hardly been hidden. The late Pope Francis repeatedly stated that while the Church cannot recognize same-sex marriage as a holy sacrament, states should regulate same-sex unions, as people of that orientation also deserve legal protection. He called upon Church officials to provide pastoral care to all believers. These were not insignificant words coming from the leader of the Western Church — they played a major role in transforming gender ideology into not merely a social movement, but into an unofficial religion of the Western world. Therefore, the findings of Do No Harm regarding the Catholic Church’s involvement in child gender transition procedures came as little surprise.
HOLLYWOOD, DISNEY, AND THE CLASSROOM…
Beyond the Catholic Church’s direct participation in this American madness, schools have also played a central role — while the film industry, music and reality stars, and animated films have not backed down either. Hollywood has subordinated nearly everything to gender and woke ideology, to the point that films now routinely rewrite historical facts to ensure “adequate representation” of women and Black people. Meanwhile, the Disney industry holds the leading role in the indoctrination of the young.
Famous fairy-tale adaptations that many generations grew up with have been so heavily altered that almost no animated film today fails to deliver — not merely subliminal messages — but direct invitations for children to become active participants in the new gender and woke culture. It is no longer about normalizing or accepting individuals who identify that way; it has become something one must be.
An example of inclusivity and positive discrimination was seen in the remake of the classic The Little Mermaid, when a Black actress was cast in the lead role. Yet this contrast is minor compared to the countless other new animated films and remakes that have captivated youth across the United States — and indeed, across the world, including Serbia.
One of the most popular modern franchises that came out as an animated film, Frozen, completely captivated the youngest audiences. Yet behind the image of the strong older sister lies a deeply dark character — a symbol of the struggle for self-preservation, female power, and disguised feminism.
The blonde beauty — unlike any you would ever see in real life — had to be adapted to the stereotypical image of a princess. After all, what child would fall in love with an animated version of Staša Zajović, Vesna Pešić, or any real-life feminist?
ELSA – THE NEW LGBT ICON
Unlike her sister Anna, whose romantic storyline defined both films and who is portrayed as less efficient because her feelings toward her partner complicate her life, Elsa is a cold woman who discovers her powers and emerges as someone superior to her sister. Many critics have described this animated character as a new icon of the LGBT community. Disney has never confirmed these claims — but it never needed to.
In the remake of the musical Beauty and the Beast, two characters — LeFou and Gaston — are portrayed as being in a romantic relationship. Although their connection is shown subtly, early propaganda is often not aggressive — precisely so that viewers can digest it more easily. This film marked the first Disney production that officially opened the “gender madness” era.
OUT is a short animated film produced by Disney’s Pixar studio, following the story of a gay man named Greg who struggles to come out to his parents. After that, more animated films followed — Cinderella, Peter Pan, Willow, the continuation of Toy Story, and many others.
YOU HAVE TO BE
We have reached the point where, in the Western world — with the exception of a few countries — gender madness has truly evolved into a kind of religion, into what they would say in the West: “you have to be.” There are no longer any taboos regarding sexuality at any stage of life; instead, it has become shameful to be normal.
Supporting this is the growing number of LGBT-oriented kindergartens in the West, not only in the United States but also in Europe. Germany now has dozens of such institutions, as do the United Kingdom, France, and Austria. Yet, as if that weren’t enough, regular kindergartens have begun introducing the option for children to “choose their gender.”
However, unlike the United States, where this practice is already widespread, some resistance still exists in Europe. For instance, in Graz, Austria, parents protested against the options presented to them by kindergarten staff when filling out enrollment forms — forms that listed as many as six different genders.
According to the authorities, this move is in line with federal law, which has been adapting for years to new standards of gender equality. However, the decision has sparked strong public resistance, especially among parents and conservative politicians, who consider the introduction of six gender categories to be absurd and unnecessary.
DRAG QUEEN – AN INTRODUCTION TO THE WORLD OF FAIRY TALES
We have already written about “drag queens” who visit kindergartens across the Western world, aiming not only to normalize their pathological deviations but also to inspire children to want to become the main attraction themselves — colorful, entertaining, and attention-grabbing in the eyes of their teachers.
In the past, fairy tales in kindergartens and early school grades were read by poets, authors of those stories, or other eminent figures who deserved respect within the community — as well as by children’s authority figures such as teachers and educators. It was only natural for children to want to be like those special people who stood at the center of attention.
Recently, social media has been flooded with videos from Texas parents protesting against educators who criticized them for dressing their children in “gendered colors” — saying that girls should not be encouraged to wear pink dresses, nor boys to wear only blue. In some U.S. states governed by Democrats, kindergartens even have special days of the week when boys are dressed as girls and vice versa.
What is even more troubling than the involvement of the Roman Catholic Church in gender transition procedures is the behavior of parents who consciously destroy the lives of their own children — children who are still unaware of their true existence, let alone their sexual orientation.
THE CHARMS OF INCLUSION
Alongside drag queens and LGBT kindergartens, the entire school curriculum has become saturated with gender and feminist ideology. It has reached the point where it is considered more important for a child to understand “gender fluidity,” accept sexual diversity, and grasp the “charms of inclusion” than to learn how to read and write.
A perfect example of this can be found in schools in Oregon, where the state has lowered academic standards so drastically in favor of positive discrimination that high school students are no longer required to demonstrate basic reading, writing, or math skills in order to graduate. School curricula, textbooks, and even recreational reading materials — as well as countless workshops — are all adjusted to promote ignorance under the guise of equality.
One might ask: why would the architects of the “deep state” deliberately destroy their own population through total degradation? But who needs a society capable of thinking independently, armed with knowledge and moral principles? Isn’t it far easier to control a managed crowd that merely has the illusion of freedom rather than a truly educated and free elite?
When these facts alone are considered — and they represent only a fraction of what we can actually see — the statistic of 14,000 children undergoing gender transition is not surprising at all. Frightening, yes — but entirely predictable in an environment that encourages it more and more each year.
PROFIT AND NOTHING BUT PROFIT
According to official data, the pharmaceutical industry in the United States earned $574 billion in 2023. The largest portion of this revenue came from COVID-19 vaccines and oncology therapies, which also include chemical puberty blockers administered to teenagers.
Since the data are not publicly disclosed, partly because the same puberty blockers are used both in cancer treatments and for gender transition purposes, it is difficult to determine the exact figures. However, according to publicly available information, data from late 2021 showed that around 121,000 minors under 18 in the U.S. were diagnosed with gender dysphoria. The total number of prescriptions for puberty blockers in 2022 exceeded 34,000, while in the following year approximately 14,700 new prescriptions were issued, a decline attributed to growing legal restrictions and changes in legislation, especially in states like Texas and Florida.
Puberty blocker and gender transition therapies are completely free of charge, just as they are in Serbia, unlike oncology treatments, which involve the same medications but are not free for cancer patients. What’s even more notable is that this is only the beginning of the pharmaceutical companies’ profit chain. The puberty blocker therapy, offered to young people convinced by their surroundings to destroy their own lives, provides only short-term results. What follows afterward is lifelong hormonal therapy, as a consequence of taking these extremely strong and insufficiently tested drugs.
These treatments cause reduced bone density, depression, cognitive developmental issues, and other severe side effects, effectively contributing to a chemical degradation of the nation. They also cause fertility problems, hinder physical development, and lead to numerous other long-term consequences.
The U.S. National Institutes of Health spent $10 million studying the condition of children subjected to “hormone therapy.” However, they decided not to publish the results. As Dr. Johanna Olson-Kennedy told The New York Times, she feared that critics of “transgender child care” might use the research as “a weapon” and that it could “one day be used in court to argue against the use of blockers.”
All of this supports the view that the United States has done everything possible to establish a new culture based on sexual identity as its core principle—a culture that is paradoxically not free at all, since it seeks to suppress heterosexuality, whiteness, and anyone who dares to stand out. Society must now be inclusive, adjusted to a new religion—one that has become the very foundation of modern Western existence. Perhaps even aware of its own decay, like an envious and sick mind, the West has been doing everything in its power to spread its madness across the world.
CONSEQUENCES IN THE USA — THE WOUNDED BEAST DOESN’T REST
After everything, one should not live under the illusion that this “wounded beast” will die overnight. Passing a law is one thing, and uprooting an ideological network that has been built and entrenched for years through official institutions, the media, schools, the NGO sector and corporations is quite another. Despite announcements that it will no longer be the “global exporter of gender ideology,” America remains deeply marked by the consequences of that ideological invasion.
Immediately after the new Trump executive orders and state-level laws came into force, NGOs, activist groups, lobby centers and “resistance communities”—in other words, all elements of the deep state—began organizing mass protests, which in some cities have been going on for more than a year. Large marches in New York, Portland, Los Angeles and San Francisco gather tens of thousands of people. The media and corporations, especially Hollywood, which was and remains the core of all these sick agendas, have not quieted down; on the contrary, they are acting even more aggressively now. Of course, not even the strictest laws can destroy a disease that has been promoted for years overnight.
ATTACK ON DISSIDENTS
Most of the new generations do not know the old system and, simply put, the “normal world” — the world in which the traditional family existed; they are people who grew up in a culture of relativism, gender deconstruction, and replacing the family with a “chosen community,” and it is natural that they will not suddenly change their beliefs. Time and patience are required. This disease cannot be eradicated by killing the infected. A cultural immunization must be built through education, family, truth and care.
But this new normality already carries its victims. The murder of Charles Kirk represents a tragic and symbolic pinnacle of this cultural aggression. Kirk, one of the loudest voices of the young, Christian-oriented America, was not only a political activist but also a voice of reason in crazy times. His activism at U.S. universities helped to break the hardest core of left-liberal anarchists, and therefore he was one of the main enemies of those who will not so easily give up the “free America.” Thus his murder was not the act of a lone fanatic or an exemplary student; it is an extreme consequential expression of ideological fanaticism that is no longer passive but is moving into physical confrontations and killings.
CELEBRATION IN HONOR OF KIRK’S MURDER
Those who had preached “tolerance” for years are now showing their true face—not only through Kirk’s murder, but through their reaction to it, which was celebrated across America. In several U.S. cities, liberals even organized parties and public celebrations in the streets. This clearly shows that such an ideology cannot tolerate any differing voice and can no longer be called a culture of freedom. It is a new totalitarianism, masked with rainbow flags, slogans about human rights, and screams about democracy. Kirk’s death exposes the reality: these are people who not only refuse to give up their ground but are willing to physically eliminate anyone who tries to restore normality.
However, although America has become, for many, a symbol of resistance, the ideological front has now shifted to Europe. What has been legally banned in the United States is still institutionally supported and systematically financed in Europe. Brussels, Berlin, London, and Paris have long been the capitals of cultural transformation based on “inclusion,” “diversity,” and the deconstruction of gender identity.
Trump did indeed declare that America would no longer be the exporter of gender ideology—but by then, it was already too late. The export had already taken place, and those who followed America’s lead are now embedding that ideology into the systems of other countries, including our own.
